*snort* I would love to see them try to arrest and charge that many people smfh, its a fake world, full of fake people, me and the boys on our way to the execution chamber. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? There have been two stand-out examples. Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? "We're not asking for censorship, we don't want to take any elements out of the games," he said. Schadenfreude420 7 oct 2021. Of which Starsector is not. >_>. Ohh man. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. could potentially make them more interesting than just shoot shoot shoot in a hail of bullets. October 7, 2013 in Off-Topic Discussion. For more information, please see our AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. 311 6. . They can go ahead and give an opinion but at the end of the day, people like me couldn't GAF. A Q&A document posted on the organisations website explains: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for peoples actions and decisions. Killing civilians gets points deducted or what-have-you, while shooting the baddies progresses the game or gets you points. No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. Its just making it more realistic, the same way the military has rules on the battlefield, then gamers have the same rules., While concern over the influence of violence in video games is shared by many, researchers have not established a definitive link. Is this feasible? Posted October 7, 2013 Battlefield 4 the siege of Shanghai level, GTA5 Online: microtransactions disabled as connection woes continue, Call of Duty Ghosts: hands-on and new details, A Q&A document posted on the organisation's website. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. ItsTickleTipson 5 feb 2022. How the left is pushing us toward civil war, and how this has worked in the past. That Red Cross person should understand that it is just a game and not reality. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games? Mongoose, - player abilities. It sounds to me more like some guy's personal vendetta against gamers. Threaded Mode | Linear Mode. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Yes gamers should be held responsible. 1. Complete address if you would like to receive our posted newsletter. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studio's games will now be implementing the suggestions. A well disciplined enemy! The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studios games will now be implementing the suggestions. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. 03/10/2013 Guardian Games Blog The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws Don't shoot the civilians. Join us on Discord at https://discord.gg/TtR32WT. 431 39. He added that they were not concerned with fantasy games, but those that mimic situations that might be seen in current armed conflicts, known as first person shooters although he declined to name specific titles. There should be no responsibility or games would get boring, we play them to escape responsibility. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, you'll probably get a 'mission failed' message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. Dont shoot the civilians. April 13, 2022 at 5:01 a.m. Hybbridd 3 feb 2022. nup thats the check if they are really dead test, ^^^^ no, but getting left with blue balls after a pillow fight with one of the girls. I mean saved in the last 6 years, Every Minecraft player would go to jail for villager trafficking, I may have committed Genozide in multiple villages and also took war prisoners, creepy is Im not even the worst, Ummm . Plenty of warfare though. And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. And like someone pointed out earlier, it's not like many countries that engage in combat actions often actually follow their own rules of engagement anyway. Last I checked, I'm out and about hunting bad guys whether they're the Covenant from the 'Halo' series or terrorists bad guys in 'Modern Warfare'. THE Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Often the most affecting moments are those hidden in momentary or supplementary features. Next thing you know, the Red Cross will want to require psych evals for people that have thoughts contrary to their rules. It's not actually advocating that gamers themselves suffer some kind of actual punishment for committing in-game warcrimes. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes - funny, gamers, accountable, in-game, crimes. You must log in or register to reply here. The ICRC's Franois Snchaud justified his organisation's request for consequences, saying "it's very difficult to make the distinction between real footage and the footage you can get from video games." The world must hold Vladimir Putin and his inner circle accountable for international crimes war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression . Gamers should be rewarded for in game war crimes. When they start filing sex abuse charges for watching porn hub.some of you guys are real trouble. Ad Bot. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) [History] Keith Stuart / The Guardian - "Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?" (2013) KotakuInAction Original. Jeezsmdh. . In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause: Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally recognized as indispensable. Sun Tzu would probably laugh at all of it. The question is, how feasible are the ICRC's aims and will players really take on board the lessons about humanitarian law? In the heat of the game, facing a furious mob, many players will take the lethal option but they sure as hell think about it. sheesh. Currently, the American Psychological Association is reviewing its 2005 statement that said there "appears to be evidence" of this; a coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, arguing that, based on the current research, some assertions in the statement "cannot be supported.". It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations. By checking this box I consent to the use of my information for the above purpose. Or you could just get a free pornhub premium account. Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? Post your templates or request one instead! Hello! Buddy, that's amature stuff compared to r/RimWorld. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. Let's start by taking back our Language! Crime and Punishment . Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. 457 16. People must really be bored by the covid lock down. Same. We do often see the consequences of player actions being threaded into gameplay, but this tends to be in the adventure genre. The BBC were quoting The Red Cross in an interview with The Guardian - these were not the opinions of the BBC. It's still dumb. Re-start mission?". Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. If they actually played the game they'd see that the point of the game is beating the bullies. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. BBC has no right to stick their nose in bloody business that's theirs. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. The jury of Tenno looking in disbelief as the defense lawyer starts committing more war crimes against the plaintiffs to prove Saryn's innocence meanwhile the Judge is either joining in on the war crimes or died instantly. IFunny Brazil is fun of your life. How dare any news organisation report something that people don't want to hear. You will not believe how many times I tell to random dudes. This is something military games have been telling us for many years. Video games, while violent and often depicting death, do not result in the real world equivalent of dead people. If I think too hard on how this level of insanity and/or sheer stupidity came about I'm going to bust my brain. Yeah there is some talent gettin about there Uff this lockdowns hittin hard but on the upside it aint quite a gulag where u need to pay someone in food to get inspiration to keep world peace. Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. It makes me want him as a wisecracking sidekick). I remember my first go on Taito's explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-'em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. "Nobody ever considers themselves to be the villain.". It's not interested in excising the offending scenarios from games entirely, arguing that "sanitizing videogames of such acts is not realistic" given such atrocities do occur in real conflict. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. warp scramble them for 8 hours sometime, that's grief. JavaScript is disabled. ? Butfrom a serious perspective this article refers to realistic conflict and it makes absolute sense that people, especially young impressionable people are made to realise that actions in the real world have consequences. Both Conservatives and Liberals act like such fucking cunts when it comes to violent video games. ODogX 6 may 2020 692 27 *remembers what happened in Dubai* BUKLAU_CHANG 6 may 2020 618 46 Should politicians be held accountable for the wars they start? 16 mar 2022. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. This topic makes me laugh. 6. - various concepts for suit add-ons and effects. Blockland Forums Home; Help; Login; Register; Blockland Forums . The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. "It's difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.". 840 21. No Votes: 18 94.7% Other Votes: . And vitally, those who point their gun in the air before firing get the same dispersal effect without casualties. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Why though? Nothing happened in 20w09a but they deserved it. We are at war with another corp. One of their members challenges me to a 1 on 1 and assures me the rest of their guys will abide by it. This'. Furthermore, the ICRC statement makes clear that it is not interested in other genres it is concentrating on combat games that depict and concentrate on contemporary battlefields. I don't think Prototype would count under "realistic war game", (PS, that's a cool raccoon drawing. Talk about a victimless crime. 99% of the possible targets on the field were in fact baddies and had the free to kill on them. When you don't have the sack for the real thing, how else are they going to mind fuck you into believing, they know whats best for all? Need for speed players Blade and sorcery players . If you kill an enemy combatant in real life, then t-bag the shit outta his/her face, is that a crime? Advertisement. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. There's also a robotic empire where you can set it so it can't negotiate with organic species and only robotic ones, 'determined exterminator' it only wants to destroy organics. If nothing else, adding behind-the-scenes political proceedings would increase the realism and imersiveness of war games, making them more fun (to me, anyway). In games, moral depth is much more about humanisation than it is about punishment. High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. In a scene reminiscent of the Black Hawk Down incident, they must decide whether to shoot their way out or face death. Our Discord Server can be found in the sidebar below. Great read! maybe games really ARE too realistic =P. If you'd like to support our work with a donation, see here or choose Paypal or Patreon. Arma 2: The Red Cross believes that as video games become ever more realistic, they should also adhere to international rules of warfare. What do you call a character that runs? i play universe sandbox 2 and dbfz so. Ark players. War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says Oct. 3, 2013, 12:16 AM PDT By Henry Austin, NBC News contributor The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video. These games were rarely straightforward escapist action yarns, they brought grit and tactical depth, and they did so by utilising Clancy's idea of a world overrun by warring techno factions.. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. It'd make hell of a lot of sense to add to the realism. (Read 1746 times) Privacy Policy. Cookie Notice TikTok video from TommyKay (@tommykaydaily): "Should gamers go to jail for ingame war crimes? "It is a war crime to attack a nuclear power plant," the embassy said on its official Twitter feed on March 4. I loved how when the GTA series first came into the public and right away people were saying it's nothing but a game where you kill cops all day. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." Fun fact: we deliver faster than Amazon. I sure do love the smell of executed and wounded Germans in the cold streets of Stalingrad. 2023 Vox Media, LLC. Anyone who's played a GTA game knows you want to avoid killing cops because the game is unplayable if your wanted level is filled up. What about the few people that 100% the entire CoD series? Via CNET | Source International Committee of the Red Cross. TheInternational Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that itwon't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. I play Stellaris and in that game I literally enslave, genocide, displace entire species and one of the things I can do is eat them/work them to death. In Modern Warfare 2's notorious No Russian mission a US soldier is embedded with a Russian terrorist organisation and must take part in a mass killing at an airport. #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. All of us: #starwars #battlefront #should #gamers #accountable #game #war. gamers are sub-human. For more information, please see our On the other hand, the ICRC feels players found "respecting the law of armed conflict" should be rewarded. There is a big line between reality and the virtual world and for example, I cannot remember a video game shooter where I'm gunning civilians. IE 11 is not supported. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. We use Mailchimp to store this information and send emails. These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. LeCard's example of enemies looking to surrender, having to subdue them, handcuff them, handle that aspect of the mission instead of just "er mah gerd shert shert shert them all, keep sherting til they're all deeeerd!". Hehe, yea.Sun Tzu would be laughing at all this. "We're not trying to make games boring or preachy, but were hoping that the ones that offer a realistic portrayal of a modern battlefield can incorporate some sort of reward or penalties depending on whether they follow the basic rules of armed conflict. Signup Login. Also, zombie games are not included in this, in a zombie game if it twitches it dies! I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. The corporate nature of the F1 world dictates that, in any game depicting it, every sponsor's logo, advertising hoarding and so on has to be authentic, which is why it's physically impossible for. Gamers in their right should play video games however they want it and when they want it. Ace Combat players: #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #ace #combat. Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123; Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities.