If not, then the art critics interpretation is, From a Byzantine priority (Traditional Christian Church Textus Receptus reading) perspective, the Washingtonianus manuscript and the other early Alexandrian Uncials testify in favor of the early and consistent underlying text found within the Majority of Greek New Testament manuscripts. CB I had to laugh as I was thinking nearly the same thing when I read you post. They play both sides sometimes it is original and sometimes not. One such scholar is Jason David BeDuhn, associate professor of religious studies at Northern Arizona University in the United States. contends that Tischendorf should be considered a hero, not a thief, Tischendorf on Trial for Removing Codex Sinaiticus, the Oldest New Testament., 3 Pilgrimage Paths from Galilee to Jerusalem, Dating the Oldest New Testament Christian Manuscripts, The Bethesda Pool, Site of One of Jesus Miracles, The Original Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls, https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SinVat_Galatians.pdf, https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SPLIT%20TEXTS_JETS_current.pdf, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukRCVDmiAts, https://books.google.com/books/about/In_the_Beginning.html?id=C8Nw_SN2zgYC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button#v=onepage&q&f=false, https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007409#h=22:2-23:524https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007409#h=22:2-23:524, http://www.revisedstandard.net/text/WNP/id_3.html, http://purebibleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNv-zzpIwBs, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqBEuxGY7DI, http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200270815. Ancient manuscripts? Consider another example. But do it with a sincerely open mind. The Codex Sinaiticus appears to have the reading (as opposed to of the Textus Receptus) with some marks above it. The Apocripha/Deuterocanonicals is present in Sinaiticus. Taken as a whole the dates and breath of manuscripts give a clear reliable picture of the gospel that Christians hold to. And no less so today. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Nowhere does the OT say; He was with God in the beginning. The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, . Anything that gets into the public arena gets trashed, but in a way it makes me happy to read all, the responses, because it tells me that there are still passionate people out there who are looking. Can these manuscripts be useful to Bible students today? Galatians 4:6. What is so important about the KJV being a translation from the Textus Receptus (received text)??? Why dont you do another article comparing all the similarities of the CS with other early manuscripts? The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ' Majority Text' in 13,000 places. Did the editor who has written the last book of Mark,wrote any other passages after Mark. It appears in the Greek Codex Alexandrinus of the fifth century, the Latin Vulgate, and elsewhere. Blessings to you! Westcott and Hort highly valued the Romish texts -Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, as well as the doctrines of Rome above Protestant doctrine though they were publicly involved in the Protestant church. -Thus proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus. There is growing forensic evidence that the Codex Sinaiticus is a 19th century forgery, sponsored by the Catholic Church, in order to undermine the Protestant Bible. This cannot be an unblemished codex. How is it that these ancient manuscripts lay forgotten (Siniaticus) or ignored (Vaticanus) for 1500 years or more? How is this negative? Please site such evidence if it exists. And then when I read a modern version of the Bible (derived from the Westcott and Hort revisions) I never experience this power or anything like it at all??? . Like all of them If there is more than what is listed here on this page? The whole thing was written cerca 1832. Is it? No one said they were quoteing Joe but passing on what they remembered. Read Edward F. Hills Believing Bible Study. However, this addition does not appear in the oldest Greek manuscripts. Describes her perfectly. It was found in the Cairo environs with evidence of origin in the 4th or 5th century, right around the time of Athanasius but l wont jump to any conclusions. Revelation and discernment of all things spiritual are given to those who seek with all of their heart, mind and soul. True followers of Jesus Christ are lead by the power of the Holy Spirit. And our excuse.? Any Greek representation of the New Testament is not factual as to the true text. are very corrupt in nature such as Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus (A 02), Bezae Canatbrigiensis (D 05). Forgive my ignorance, please. Codex Bezae is the lone Greek manuscript that reads orgistheis (angry or indignant) there, probably because the Greek text of Codex D at this point is a retro-translation of a flawed Latin attempt to render the Greek word for moved-in-the-guts.. (re Luke. Earlier? safaree net worth 2021 forbes textus receptus vs septuagint. Hope this is helpful to prevent some misunderstandings. Then We sent after them our apostles and We sent Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him compassion and mercy; and monasticism, they invented it. The Codex Vaticanus ( The Vatican, Bibl. Ever think possibly he had more than ONE resource ??? It should be noted, for starters, that the four pages containing Mark 15:54b-Luke 1:56a were not produced by the same copyist who wrote the text on the surrounding pages. Details are important. Im aware of no historical evidence that anything was erased and replaced. I think Id remember if I saw someone die, then rise to life, walk into my room and had lunch with me. Unless I am mistaken, I have not seen the book of Daniel in the codex sinaticus. How do the >English< translations of Mark 16.1-14 match word for word in KJV and , yet don't in Matt 6.9-13? If memory serves me, it was a book about women christian martyrs. There are likely missing portions on the Codex because they added to the current texts in order to push their dogma and make it more palatable to those they wished to convert. But it would be fair for an annotated version of the Bible to include reference to Why are u sending any time on this fraud? But also the TaNaKh which gives the OT a different structure to consider, especially when you talk about prophets. Sinaiticus and Vaticanus disagree with one another in more than 3,000 places in the four Gospels alone! BeDuhn points out that the general public and many Bible scholars assume that the differences in the New World Translation (NW) are due to religious bias on the part of its translators. I bless you in the Name of the Father, the SON and the HOLY Spirit. This is the cause of the surprise of the British Library staff, who are acknowledged world class experts in handling such manuscripts. his words will never pass away ! This was the greatest moment in thier lives for all there and they would have been really focused on what the ciach had to say,. (If youd like to learn something about the ending of Mark in Codex Sinaiticus, by the way, I have some research about that I would gladly share. Historically, the Textus Receptus had long served as the primary Greek text for New Testament studies. And no, Steve, the are thousands and thousands positives and no negatives at all. See following corroborative analysis comparing the two Alexandrian codices (Vaticanus B and Sinaiticus Aleph) Pilate flatly told the Jewish leaders that he found NO FAULT in this man. Codex Sinaiticus Our Father in heaven, Hallowed be thy name, Thy kingdom come. In his article Hero or Thief? think ian mportant thought, before general literacy the spoken word was all one had and the idea of quoting a past remark was not part of the culture. Who has made all the ends of the earth to rise? The fact all four codices, discovered in four separate places and times, all agree with one another suggests Textus Receptus (Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus) ADDED them in the 16th century AD. Better read Revelation 22:18 The KJV is actually a revision of an earlier translation; The Bishops Bible published in 1568. In the end days, knowledge shall increase. See Dr Bill Cooper PhD, ThD, The Forging of the Codex Sinaiticus and New Testament Fragments. 8 years of Archaeology Odyssey online, exploring the ancient roots of the Western world in a scholarly and entertaining way, The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land. Amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls. Sinaiticus has moved with compassion, splanchnistheis in Greek, and not angry as you write. This is a famous variant in the mss, but Codex Sinaiticus attests compassion, not anger. Some of them like the Codex have missing pieces, but nothing here significantly alters the Christian gospel. Makes me cringe if it really is the best and the oldest. One other omission in Codex Sinaiticus with theological implications is the reference to Jesus ascension in Luke 24:51. Woe to the Textus Receptus supporters. I found the many negatives, outweigh the few positives.I forced myself to face the truth of this, grew up and have been happy not to look back. They knew exactly what Jesus was saying That is why the copying of Bible manuscripts was such a big business. The codex sin was proven to be a fraudulent in court. almost a millionaireAnd so if my little stash is diminshed little by little who will care? And for those who have sinned I was Modern scholarship generally holds that Mark is in fact the oldest of the Synoptic Gospels, which could cause theological concerns over the omitted resurrection. Library Visit the library for more information on the Textus Receptus. Sinaiticus has 9000 passages differently than Textus Receptus. One needs to study the various Codices and again ask why have certain critical aspects like (1) Jesus Christ being part of the Godhead, or (2) that we are saved only through Jesus Christ and his blood atoning sacrifice for our sins, have been changed or completely left out? Its simple as that folks. righteousness which is in heaven.[. Then that history was erased, and replaced with the gosple account agreeable to the era? However, in 1881 scholars Westcott and Hort published a new Greek New Testament text that included the findings of Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. 2. My question about, neither the son is there This modified version from 1885 has the name "Revised Version". Learn more by reading Tischendorf on Trial for Removing Codex Sinaiticus, the Oldest New Testament.. Unfortunately, the comments section that follow the article remind us that anti-Catholic bigotry and the ignorance from which it springs is still present in the minds and hearts of fundamentalist Christians. Just like in the 1800s , Europe saw an infiltration into the Seminaries and Colleges by Romes agents to weaken Protestant influence for the ensuing generations and swing them back to Rome (still going on today folks), so too the work of W&H in the late 1800s brought a major shift in the thinking about how scholars should or could go about their work of translation of Scripture. Also, in Matthew 6:9, Codex Sinaiticus *does* have the phrase who is in heaven (which is omitted as presented above). Dating to the mid-fourth century C.E., Codex Sinaiticus is the oldest complete manuscript of the New Testament. Some modern versions of the New Testament, based primarily on the Alexandrian Text, have drawn many readings into question even though the readings are affirmed in ancient patristic compositions and are supported by the overwhelming majority of manuscripts. But rather how many manuscripts that predate Codex Sinaiticus contain the missing language if any? http://www.sinaiticus.net/, Sinaiticus authentic antiquity or modern? Codex Sinaiticus, also known as "Aleph" (the Hebrew letter ), was found by Count Tischendorf in 1859 at the Monastery of St Catherine on Mount Sinai. We have recently reviewed the biblical texts and corrected any apparent mistakes. How come these two were preserved when many thousands of others were not? It dismays me, sincerely. Before Mark and Matthew and Luke, there was supposedly Q, M, L all those other documents? Let us fear God and love Him and treat His word with more respect. No products in the cart. Since then, many editions of the Greek New Testament have been published. Textual Variants that are Meaningful and Viable The Three Competing Theories - Overview New Testament Textual Families or "Text Types" The "Critical Text" Theory, aka "Reasoned Eclecticism The Rules of Textual Criticism According to Reasoned Eclecticism The Aland Rules of Textual Criticism Reasoned Eclecticism Methodology The only Greek manuscript with that reading is the bilingual Codex Bezae (D/05) from the V century. Mystery Babylon that the apostle John writes of in the Unveiling of Christ (Revelation). Wilbur N. Pickering, Th.M Ph.D is qioted as saying It doesnt alter Christian theology to include it. Who is the envisioned recipient of this article? If somebody takes one of those dollar coins, it still looks like a lot money and I almost have a million dollars. Also, in Matthew 6:13, Codex Sinaiticus ends the Lords Prayer with the phrase but deliver us from [the] evil [one] (which is omitted above), but the doxology (for thine is the kingdom) is absent. I believe that by the power of the Holy Spirit the mysteries will be revealed to those who seek truth. Constantine Tischendorf Turns Two Hundred in the September/October 2015 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, Stanley E. Porter contends that Tischendorf should be considered a hero, not a thief. Compare differences between the King James Version and Codex Sinaiticus. Ronald S. Hendel of the University of California, Berkeley, argues that scholars can reconstruct a more original Hebrew Bible text if they " combine the best from each tradition .". Set it in stone rag. Am I the only person who often finds more help, information, and encouragement in the comments than I do in the article provided? A court is not the appropriate place to prove or disprove the authenticity of old manuscripts. My goodness it appears that the Word of God inerrant, unchanging has many versions, and that these versions do not agree with each other. A translator that believes can be biased by his believes. Chuck said that the reason that many of these older manuscripts survived was because the early church did not trust them and so, they werent used and spared the damage which would have normally occurred to documents in continuous use. there is evidence of textual tampering, attempts at artificially aging the manuscript, and alleged bookworm tracks that start in the middle of the page. Andrew says on 27 May 2016. The idea that older is automatically better has deceived many people when it comes to this text that was found by Tischendorf and used by Westcott and Hort and the like. God Bless you all with light to Truth. Those Jewish leaders I dare say would have been far more familiar with the OT than you or I have ever been. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukRCVDmiAts. Of course I dont want to seem to imply that such inability to feel empathy is limited to Christians, Far from it. And we have very good reason, from Pauls letters, most of which are accepted as authentic even by non-Christian scholars, that the earliest disciples believed that they had seen the risen Jesus on multiple independent occasions and were willing to die for that belief. https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SinVat_Galatians.pdf That is the question you must ask and answer for yourself honestly and carefully. I believe youll find that no one every spoke like Jesus, because Jesus was more than a man. Scholars in favor of the critical text of the bible, view the Codex Sinaiticus to be one of the greatest Greek texts of the New Testament and the codex is a celebrated historical treasure by many modern scholars, along with that of the Codex Vaticanus. The question is not so much that the English translations should vary I get that but how the Mark translations match. The King James and Tischendorf? Clearly, as promised, Jehovah God has preserved his Holy Word. Most of the epistles are written before the gospels. But the people supporting the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus say that since Textus Receptus came after these two, many things must have been erroneously added to the texts. What is His name, and what is His Sons name? Mark 16:6 And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him. We know the Catholics hated the Bible then and even today. Even back then there was an undue political influence and the personal interests of committee members affected the outcome Matthew 24/37 are you sure and how sure you are? Each issue of Biblical Archaeology Review features lavishly illustrated and easy-to-understand articles such as: Fascinating finds from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament periods, The latest scholarship by the world's greatest archaeologists and distinguished scholars, Stunning color photographs, informative maps, and diagrams, Reviews of the latest books on biblical archaeology, 45+ years of Biblical Archaeology Review, 20+ years of Bible Review online, providing critical interpretations of biblical texts. To answer your questions in order, 1) The source of the text underlying most English translations today would be some combination of Greek texts as produced from primarily the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus Manuscripts by Nestle/Aland or United Bible Societies. Tyndale? Is it not because of these negatives that the world is so rotten as it is? The above article barely scratches the surface of the difference between the King James Version Bible (based on Textus Receptus) and Codex Sinaiticus. The devil you can see is not so much a problem as the devil which you cant see, but yet is very active. 4 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. Steve, you have the DNA of GOD in you. Codex Vaticanus, gathering dust in the Vatican library since the 1500s and Codex Sinaiticus, rescued from a trash can in St. Catherines monasteryused by Westcott and Hort to rewrite the KJV. Each will find their own way. And again before the written word, the idea of memorizing what was said was not part of culture. Robert, i too recently read the kj for the first time starting in may. Then at the last, they show one instance when the Codex referred to the Son of God and said it is an addition, not original. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007409#h=22:2-23:524https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007409#h=22:2-23:524. re 17. The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts are part of this group. Here is Matthew 16:14. Thanks. Vat., Vat. Four highly acclaimed books, published in conjunction with the Smithsonian Institution: Aspects of Monotheism, Feminist Approaches to the Bible, The Rise of Ancient Israel and The Search for Jesus. textus receptus vs septuagint. The KJV is familiar to most of us so naturally we prefer the familiar, but to place it on par with the original Greek manuscripts of the bible seems sacrilegious. Amen ! Recently found my way back to God, after researching for many, many years other types of religions/beleifs. Two hundred years after Constantine Tischendorfs birth, questions remain as to the conditions of his removal of Codex Sinaiticus from St. Catherines Monastery. Back in 2008, a BBC report by Roger Bolton spread the erroneous claim that Codex Sinaiticus read angry in Mark 1:41 and Bolton also described the verse as part of an encounter between Jesus and a blind man, instead of a leper. UNHOLY HANDS ON THE BIBLE, BURGON, GREEN, SOVEREIGN GRAC PUB. Thats pretty much identical to the late, great Chuck Smiths (founder of the Calvary Chapel movement) opinion. On one side they say that the Textus Receptus scribes corrected the "Corrections" of the former two texts and hence KJV have those additional verses. Second, they use the Codex to show that several key parts of the New Testament showing the deity of Messiah are absent, and the Codex is more original. Also, like most early mss, Codex Sinaiticus omits John 7:53-8:11, not just 8:3-11. check out this documentary by Abduhla Films called Bridge To Babylon As Jeff said, you guys are confused about Mark 1:41. These two facts should be enough to get your mind thinking whether you have made a right judgement in your comment proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus Subversion is often of a greater danger than frontal attack. I can answer the first question here in part from my own experience. Required fields are marked *. Thank you also for the many useful links provided. If this were true, the absence of resurrection in Mark would not be a problem because it appears in the older Matthean gospel. The text of Codex Sinaiticus differs in numerous instances from that of the authorized version of the Bible in use during Tischendorfs time. After a cursory review, I count eight mistakes in this little article. The earliest manuscripts are consistent. Each of these three codices "clearly exhibits a fabricated text - is the result of arbitrary and reckless recension." . 23 I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was. And now there are Christians in every country on earth just as Jesus commanded his disciples to do. Codex Sinaiticus was made in the 4th century on parchment using capital letters (a manuscript in all capitals is called an "uncial"). Who knew the reliability of their manuscrips than the monks at St Caherines? If anyone is interested, a good place to start is the work of Dr Cooper. Textes Receptus has over 5000 manuscripts in numerous languages which all agree with each other in terms of content and detail. They are both written on parchment, and have a large number of corrections written over the original text. Have you read John Burgons The Last Twelve Verses of Mark? He concluded that Siniaticus and Vaticanus were copied from a lectionary onto superb vellum in a rich scriptorium. The old proverbial Trojan Horse trick worked very well back in the old days. This is just not possible, for there is no mention of the catastrophe in Rome when these apostles and most of the other Christians were cruelly massacred late in Neros reign. And remember this is a group of objective people, not just my own thoughts. -Thus proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus.. As Rodney King said, Cant we all just get along? Actually at least to me it does seem to be more important to be able to get along than to be right, however right is defined. This is history. Siniaticus was pristine because it was not read and loved and cried over for 1400 years. The consequences of all this are serious and are far reachiing for the future of the Church.. Besides, thats what he tells us to do, ask. Ive known for a long time these differences existed, I just have never been able to figure out how these differences came to be. Absolutely NOTHING is missing from any of the Uncial Codices Vaticanus c. 325350, Sinaiticus c. 330360, Alexandrinus c. 400440 or Ephraemi c. 450. But they as a group had heard Jesus Himself. God works in, with and through fallen human beings, even when the errors/sins are most glaring. Just a thought, but if the Sinai Bible was a fourth century record of the New Testament, and the modern canon came about under Athanasius at around 390AD, then doesnt it suggest that a lot of our modern Bible was filled in by the likes of Athanasius late in the fourth century, just before the text was canonized. The massacres are implied in Revelation, so this was written by John shortly afterwards, before Jerusalem fell to the Roman army.. "Textus Receptus Only"/"Received Text Only" - This group holds the position that the traditional Greek texts represented in the Textus Receptus were supernaturally (or providentially) preserved and that other Greek manuscripts not used in this compilation may be flawed. One of Jesus disciples had been such a zealot. So I suppose by repeating only one of Boltons amateurish mistakes, BAR is making progress. The greater danger is not so much whether a version states such things AT ALL, but how many times the total testimony is weakened. Many of the larger monasteries had a scriptorium in which the production of new manuscripts was constant. Additionally. May a non-Christian, nonJewish reader of no particular faith point out that you would seem a much greater tribute to your respective Catholic and Protestant faiths were you to behave with more charity to each other and, with good will, attempt to dissipate all odium theologicum, replacing it with a more expansive spirit of brotherly/sisterly love and respect? Keep studying, kids! Theres accountability to the record. http://purebibleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=65. In my own experience, for over thirty years, when I have raised the question of what is the correct Greek text of the New Testament, regardless of audience, the usual response has been: What difference does it make? The purpose of this article is to answer that question, at least in part. (APPENDIX II, A COMPARISON BETWEEN SIX MAJOR BIBLE VERSIONS, VOLUME II, UNHOLY HANDS ON THE BIBLE. It was not something that they had to work out..DID HE or DIDNT HE? After all this education I have decided to always demand the KJV Only. All religions are based on truth claims. personnaly have seen evangelists using NIV Codex Sinaiticus based bibles and in front of my eyes not but 3 different times this verse fulfilled. The textual character of these old texts seem to conform more to the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus than to the Textus Receptus. It has commonly been argued, for at least 200 years (John Bengel, d. 1752, was the first), that no matter what Greek text one may use it will not affect any doctrine. The catholic church is a Roman institution of anti-Christ idolatry. While faith comes by the hearing of the Word, the fact that there is the omission of the ending of St. Marks Gospel in the Sinaiticus, whatever the reason, does not prevent the Holy Spirit from bringing hearers to the knowledge of salvation in Jesus Christ, the crucified and risen Son of God. The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ' Majority Text' in 13,000 places. I am still researching this. Denominations arise from different nationalities and immigrants bringing their Christian tradition to other countries (We see this in the U.S.) But denominationalism arises from the hypocrisy of Christians who divide based on prideful arguments. The Codex Sinaiticus is serving today as the basis for almost all modern Bible translations since the beginning . It must be stated that most modern versions/translations still have statements in their pages that will support the divinity of Jesus Christ and His work on earth and on the cross, and all or most of His message etc. Thanks in advance. A piece here and a piece there but no even close to a complete speach. In the Gospel of Mark alone, Vaticanus disagrees with Sinaiticus 652 times and with Codex D 1,944 times. Sign up to receive our email newsletter and never miss an update. By submitting above, you agree to our privacy policy. They did not rely on it because they knew it was not reliable. Please give a link that is based on literature and that would show the inauthenticity of Codex Sinaiticus. A Roman Governor finds no fault with someone charged with insurrection and turning the world upside down?? and unbelief is under Satan, who does not allow the truth and If we speak of provenance in an art museum, we know where the picture has been since it was painted by the artist. How does it compare to the MSS? Whether Marks gospel is more definitive or not would be a moot issue if it was written as a subsequent addition to Johns. But regarding Mark, I would to point out another consideration. Verse Analysis Compares the 1550 Stephanus Textus Receptus with the King James Bible. When the film was made the producers had to create the speach as no one remembered what brooks had said. For example the Magna Carta (c.1200 AD) is so frail and desiccated that it is enclosed in a sealed environment, to prevent total disintegration. Ive now forgotten where and cannot find it. Although the Diatesseron had some Textus Receptus readings in it, it was considered to be corrupted. Pilate was used to trouble makers in Judea and he saw and heard a lot of phony messiahs, and many of those were armed to the teeth to try and get rid of Romes power base in Judea. If somebody knows the existence of side-by-side comparisons Id like to know about them. Every true child of GOD knows it and cannot live without it. The world of the Bible is knowable. The Textus Receptus always has the evidence on its side. Much like all of the centuries of deception by the Roman Catholic Church that have come to light in the recent years of the forgeries and lies to obtain power over the people. omits verses with a multitude of documented quotes by the earliest Pre-Nicene Christians including converts of the Apostles Paul, Peter, and John; all of whom certainly has autograph versions of the New Testament books. There were several English translations published long before the KJV; to wit, Coverdale bible (1535), Matthews bible, (1537) The Great bible, (1539) Geneva Bible, (1560) Bishops Bible, (1568), et al. Several corrections are needed to this post. And they went on to another village. Most textual critics think Jesus words (in between) found in medieval Byzantine mss was a late addition to the text. Little doubts often repeated become entrenched in the mind and eventually produce either a serious warning, or a platform for lies.